jump to navigation

Hung out to dry May 5, 2012

Posted by mareserinitatis in family, personal.
Tags: , , , ,

Some days I don’t feel like posting about science or engineering or anything like that.  This is one of those days, and I’m feeling more domestically inclined.  (Perhaps it was baking muffins that got me on this kick.)

Over a year ago, a relative of mine was featured in the local paper because of his attempts to minimize energy use and how this was connected to his ministry (he was a minister at a local church, at the time).  I actually didn’t know how far he’d gone in his attempts until reading the article, and I have to say I’ve been trying to think of ways to do things like this ever since.  The picture included with the article showed him in his basement with lines hung all around, drying his clothes.

A couple months ago, I decided that there was no reason not to try something similar.  When I was a kid, we had clotheslines in the back of most of the places we lived, but I never really liked those.  I don’t know how many times I brought in clothes that were covered in dust or seeds…or even bugs!  I also had no idea how I’d hang lines around my basement (or how to keep the kids from playing with them and turning them into a place to hang and launch toys.) Instead, I bought a couple of clothes-drying racks and set them up in my basement.  I figured it would cut down on use of our dryer (extending its longevity), cut down on energy use, and help keep some of our clothes from coming to an early demise.  (I think I read somewhere that heat destroys cotton over time, and I’ve seen it with a few of my own things.)

I tried to talk my husband into using them, but I don’t think he likes them a whole lot.  He is giving it a try…at least for now.  We’ve determined that several of our work clothes just simply can’t be dried on the rack because they get too wrinkled.  (I’m sorry, but I really don’t iron clothes unless absolutely necessary.)  Also, jeans take forever.  I keep trying to get myself onto a schedule (like I was a few years ago), where I did specific loads of laundry on specific days (Mondays was whites, Tuesdays was jeans, etc.).  I think it would work much better than just doing things on the weekend…and running out of space.  I am also trying to think harder about what kinds of clothes will dry well on the racks and try to avoid those really wrinkly things.  That’s difficult, however, as you can’t always tell how well they’ll work until you see what they look like wet.

The end result is that we’re drying about half of our laundry on the racks, while the other half is still going through the drier.  I still feel guilty that I’m not doing all of it this way, but I keep telling myself that every little bit is a step in the right direction.  (And, hey, if it cuts down on expenses, even better.)

(Thanks to Ukko.de for the picture!)

Pinewood derby: What a drag! January 16, 2012

Posted by mareserinitatis in engineering, physics, science, younger son.
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

My husband son competed yesterday in my son’s his scouting group’s pinewood derby race.  For those of you who have never had a kid in cub/boy scouts, they hand out these blocks of wood that you get to make into a car.  The idea isn’t to win the race: it’s supposed to be that dads and their boys spend some time bonding over manly things like woodworking.

(One year, Mike was out of town during this whole thing, so I got to be manly and help the older boy build his car.  All I can say is that Dremel tools are awesome.)

If you look on the web, you’ll find a lot of advice on how to prep pinewood derby cars and make them faster.  One thing that consistently bugs me is that one should pay attention to aerodynamics of the car and give it a low profile.

This makes me nuts.

To understand the following, you might want to know what a track looks like.  So here you go:

Let’s start out with the specifications.  Most pinewood derby tracks have a height of about 4 feet and a length of 32 feet.  I also will note that the ones we’ve raced on were wood, not aluminum.

Most of the pinewood derby cars I watched made it the whole 32 feet, though not all did.  So let’s say that, on average, they travel 32 feet.  The *fastest* ones traveled at an average speed of 10 ft/s (or 3 m/s).  The maximum they can weight 5 oz. or 140 g.

What we’re going to do here is look at how much energy the system puts into overcoming air resistance versus friction.  It’s very hard to figure out exactly how much goes into friction simply using equations, so we’re going to figure out the total energy and the energy lost to drag forces.  Once we have those two quantities, we can subtract the drag forces from the total energy and assume that the difference is equal to the frictional losses.  Finally, we can compare the drag and frictional losses.

First things first: what is our total energy?  It starts out entirely as potential energy as the cars are placed at rest on the top of the ramp.  Potential energy is, fortunately, very easy to calculate.  It is simply the product of the height of the object, its mass, and the gravitational acceleration.  In other words,

We know the mass of the car (0.14 kg), the height is approximately 1.22 m, and the graviational acceleration is 9.8 m/s2.  This results in a total potential energy of approximately 1.67 J.

The potential energy is equal to the total energy in the system since the cars start with no other kind of energy.  In a frictionless and drag-free system, all of this energy would be converted to kinetic energy and the cars would drive forever at the same speed once they reached the bottom of the ramp.  Obviously, however, that’s not what happens.  Eventually, all of the energy is converted to friction and drag, and the cars stop.

Now we need to determine the drag on the cars.  The drag equation is:

The drag force is proportional, therefore, to the density of the fluid (ρ), velocity (v), drag coefficient (CD), and cross-sectional area (A).

The density of the fluid (air) is approximately 1.2754 kg/m3, and the velocity is 3 m/s.  The cross-sectional area of the car, at maximum, is 2.75 x 3 in.  In real *ahem* units, this is 0.00532257 m2.

The drag coefficient for a long cylinder, according to Wikipedia, is 0.82.  Given the cars are all sorts of different shapes, I think this would probably be the closest approximation, although for some cars, this will be high.

All of this put together gives us a force of 0.025 N.  Over a distance of 32 feet (or 9.75 m), this gives an energy of 0.24 J.

If we assume that all of the potential energy is converted to either drag or friction, that means 0.24 J is converted to drag while 1.43 J goes into friction.  This means that roughly 14% of your energy losses are due to drag while the other 86% are due to friction.

My advice, therefore, is to not worry so much about drag and the aerodynamics of the car and to worry far more about the ways to reduce friction.

What should you do to help your pinewood derby car to be fast?  There are three things:

1) You want to maximize your potential energy, so being as close to the 140 gram maximum weight is good.  You can get all sorts of weights commercially to assist with this.  Some people have argued that putting the weights near the back of the vehicle helps even more.  I wouldn’t doubt this as you’re putting the weight at greater height, giving the car more initial energy to start with.

2) The biggest issue is reducing the friction between the wheel and the axle, and there are a few easy ways to do that: sanding and polishing the axles as well as using graphite or teflon as a lubricant.  (Our troupe doesn’t allow graphite because it marks the floors, but teflon is allowed.)

3) Reduce the friction between the car and track.  The best way to do this is to make sure your wheel alignment is as straight as possible as this will keep it from rubbing against the center of the track.

The winner of our pinewood derby actually had a very blocky car designed to look like a platypus.  I’m guessing the winner didn’t spend much time focusing on aerodynamics and instead chose to minimize their frictional losses.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,006 other followers