Wordless Wednesday: Where’s dinner? January 21, 2015Posted by mareserinitatis in pets, photography.
Tags: dinner, Gigadog, pictures, teradog, wordless wednesday
1 comment so far
Wordless Wednesday: Away from my treasure, ya scurvy two-legged land lubbers! (or cats laying on things) January 14, 2015Posted by mareserinitatis in pets, photography.
Tags: cats, macrocat, microcat, pictures, wordless wednesday
add a comment
Wheel of (PI) Fortune January 13, 2015Posted by mareserinitatis in career, engineering, feminism, science.
Tags: academia, career, engineering, research, science, women in engineering, women in science
add a comment
I came across an article in Science from last summer discussing chances of being a PI. It included a calculator so that you could look at your various inputs (number of publications, first-author publications, etc.) and see what probability you have of becoming a PI. (I’m going to state the caveat that this probably is most accurate for biological sciences given that’s where the algorithm is presented, but I didn’t see that stated specifically.) Apparently, the dependency is most heavily weighted on two factors: number of first-author publications you have as well as highest number of citations on a first-author paper.
One interesting thing to note is that the chances of becoming a PI are better for men than women. When I was going through the various examples, it seemed like men generally had about a 12% better chance than women but it seemed to range from about 12% at the greatest and decreased with additional qualifications. The lowest difference I saw for people with the same qualifications was about 8%, but that was with the very highest qualifications.
Being of a somewhat practical bent, I decided to take this for a test run using both myself and my husband’s publication records. The thing that was a bit shocking for both of us is that the heavy weighting on first authors and citations on first author papers meant that, despite the fact that he has more publications than I do, my publication record actually is better in terms of chances at a PI than his. I have more first-author publications, and I also have more citations on one of my first-author papers. For most people who know us both professionally, I’m pretty sure that’s not what they would expect.
Despite my ‘better’ publication record, his chances at being a PI were still better than mine…by 8%. Given that delta seems to be close to the delta in general between men and women, it indicates to me that bias could be pretty significant factor in getting funding, especially early on in someone’s career when they’re low on some of those first-author publications.
Fortunately, I can happily write this off as a thought exercise given both of us have been PIs on our own projects. I’m glad I didn’t know the odds going in, however.
Wordless Wednesday: Squirrel! January 6, 2015Posted by mareserinitatis in photography.
Tags: pictures, squirrel, wordless wednesday
1 comment so far
Friday Fun: Old (pirate) Movies January 2, 2015Posted by mareserinitatis in Friday Fun.
Tags: CGI, friday fun, movies, pirates
1 comment so far
Over the holiday break, we were on a bit of a pirate kick. We watched the first three Pirates of the Caribbean (PotC) movies. On New Year’s Eve, we were trying to pick out another movie and I found an old VHS tape of Cutthroat Island, one of my favorite movies from my teen years. Despite having the tape, I can’t honestly remember the last time I watched it.
Apparently, this is one of those movies that had really poor advertising when it came out. People either have never heard of it or saw it and loved it. I’d heard of it because I was on a big Geena Davis kick at the time. Who didn’t want to grow up to be like Geena Davis twenty years ago?
It was a lot of fun after watching PotC. It was very obviously made before widespread use of CGI, which led to a lot of interesting cinematography. First, the ships were beautiful and incredible, and there were lots of gorgeous scenes of sweeping around the ships from the air…something that you didn’t see a lot of in PotC. Second, there were lots of real explosions, and the stunts were obviously done by stunt doubles. With the exception of one scene where Matthew Modine was running away from an explosion and was conked on the head unexpectedly, there are a lot of scenes where they obviously pan back from the actors (especially Geena Davis) and you just somehow can tell it’s a double. And then there’s the whole thing you start to realize watching pre-CGI movies: CGI makes everything so clean and polished…and this movie wasn’t…which made it seem more real.
The thing I loved most about it, though, had nothing to do with CGI: it was that Geena Davis’ character never needs rescuing…and was often the rescuer.
Obviously it’s not a ‘classic’ pirate movie nor did it have the polish of a Disney-fied film, but it was a lot of fun. And it was a bit of time travel – backwards to the age of pirates but also backwards to the pre-CGI era. It makes me want to pull out some other “old” movies to share with the kids. What are some of your favorite “old” movies?
New Year’s Goals: The 2015 FCIWYPSC edition January 1, 2015Posted by mareserinitatis in career, family, grad school, personal, religion, research, running, work, writing.
Tags: career, family, fitness, goals, health, marriage, new years day, religion, resolutions, running, sleep, work
add a comment
I’m not doing resolutions and haven’t done them for a while. Goals, however, are another story, particularly when they’re of the quantifiable type. While some of these are large goals (like with running), I break them down to weekly and daily goals, as well.
Writing this out is helpful because not only does it provide me with some accountability, it helped me realize I was bogging myself down with too much. I had to cut a few items.
These are the things I think I can manage with some consistency:
- Career/Work: Publish at least one paper and attend at least one conference.
- Career/Dissertation: Set a minimum amount of time to work on my thesis each week, though the weekly total will vary if there’s a holiday involved. (I do some version of this, but I think I need to make my planning a bit more specific.) Also, attend one conference this year.
- Family time: Family play day once per month.
- Marriage: Keep up with the weekly date with the spousal unit.
- Self-care/Religious: Center down (or if you prefer, meditate or pray) for at least ten minutes a day, not necessarily all at once.
- Self-care/Sleep: Stick to a consistent (and early) bed-time at least 4 days per week.
- Self-care/Physical activity: Run or walk 500 miles by the end of October. I did about 200 outdoor miles this year but didn’t keep track of treadmill time at all, so I think this is doable, especially in light of my next goal. I’ve also learned I like to ramp down the activity around the holidays (too much to do), so that amounts to about 11.5 miles per week.
- Fun goal: Do half-marathons in two new states this year. Two down, 48 to go. I’m hoping to cross Wisconsin and Michigan off the list this year. (And I’ve already registered for one of them.)
- Misc/Blog: Post on the blog at least twice per week. (I do that on average, but sometimes there are long gaps in between.)
- Misc/Email: I will keep my main mailbox below 3000 messages. That may sound horrible, but this is 1/5 of what it was just last week. I need to either delete those messages, read them, or unsubscribe from all the spam I’m getting…probably mostly the latter. Lots of unread email makes me overwhelmed.
So do you have any goals for the year?
The Christmas Aftermath December 26, 2014Posted by mareserinitatis in computers, family, younger son.
Tags: computers, Mike, younger son
add a comment
Christmas presents are better when they have an element of DIY. The younger son is learning how to replace a laptop screen…
Merry Christmas! December 24, 2014Posted by mareserinitatis in Uncategorized.
Tags: christmas, holiday
add a comment
Merry Christmas to all who celebrate! And even if you don’t, you can learn a bit about geography by following the NORAD Santa tracker!
Stop telling boys to go into STEM December 18, 2014Posted by mareserinitatis in education, engineering, feminism, science, teaching.
Tags: engineering, feminism, math, science, sexism, stem, stereotypes, students, women in engineering, women in science
Stereotyping is always a bad thing, and most people don’t realize that men suffer just as badly from stereotypes as women.
Let’s look at science: there has been a ton of work going into how to attract girls and women into scientific endeavors, particularly those that are very math-intensive. Much of the discussion centers on countering two issues: the first is the societal expectations that women go into ‘caring’ professions like teaching and nursing and the second is the stereotype that men are better at math. There is nothing wrong with these efforts, but there’s a flip side to this stereotype that has a negative impact on men: there are a lot of men who go into STEM fields (probably engineering moreso than science) that probably don’t belong there.
Lest you think I’m just being negative toward men, this is actually something a man told me. I had an English professor who was one of the best college teachers I’d had, I think in part because he was very knowledgeable in science. In fact, he’d received a degree in engineering from Stanford but then shuffled around for several years before finally getting a master’s degree in English. During one conversation, I asked him why he got a degree in engineering when he really loved literature.
There’s a strong expectation that if you’re a smart boy who’s good at math, you’re going to go into engineering. That’s what everyone expected, so that’s what I did.
During the course of my teaching career, I’ve seen a lot of this. I like to have students write me an introductory essay so that I can learn more about them and what they were hoping to learn from the class. Many of them reiterated almost exactly what my professor said: “I went into engineering because I was told it was a good career for someone with good math skills.”
I’m not saying it’s not a good career for someone with math skills of either gender. However, making a career choice should not be an either/or proposition based on problem-solving ability (lots of careers use that), and people are multi-faceted. People can be good at math as well as art, literature, music, biology, communication, caring for others, etc. Just because you’re good at something doesn’t mean that’s what your calling is nor necessarily where you should focus your energy.
While the majority of my best students were men, strictly as a result of the skewed sex ratio in my classes, the women were almost always in the top 20% of the class. None of them were there simply because they were good at math: they almost always really wanted to be an engineer. However, the least engaged students were always men: a lot of them were there because they hadn’t found their passion and felt they had to do something. Engineering was it.
The flip side of the ‘men are good at math’ stereotype is that many of them go into it even when they would be much better off doing something else. They’re discouraged from pursuing more ‘feminine’ careers and made to feel like failures if they don’t enjoy it.
So do the boys a favor: if they’re not sure where they want to go, don’t make engineering the default answer even if they are good at math.