Manager in the middle July 19, 2012
Posted by mareserinitatis in career, engineering, family, research, work.Tags: coworkers, marriage, Mike, supervisor
4 comments
Way back when I was working on my MS, my husband and I got into a big argument about whether H or B was the “magnetic field”. (I’ve ranted before on terminology for various magnetic and electric quantities, so I won’t reproduce that here, but you can read a snippet on my old blog.) We attempted to solve this by going to our advisor and asking him which of us was right. Our advisor was astute enough to say he hadn’t heard of this issue before. In reality, he may not have, but he didn’t want to take sides.
I have wondered how people feel about interacting with both me and my husband at work. One person who has since left didn’t like my husband, and we both suspect that he didn’t like me as a “guilty by association”-type issue. Those type of issues are extremely rare, but I wonder what people think when one of us slips and calls the other, “Hon.” I think most of our coworkers don’t even think about it, but it still makes me uncomfortable. I know that the one time Mike slipped in front of clients, I wanted to melt into my chair.
More commonly, though, I have noticed that I will be far more confrontational and argumentative with Mike in front of our coworkers than they are willing to be with him. In one recent incident, he started going into a list of reasons why something wouldn’t work. We’d already discussed it at home, and I’d told him he was being overly cynical and putting obstacles in his path. He started going through the list again in meeting (that I was running), and I just shook my head and said I didn’t want to hear it. Of course, he ignored me and I rolled my eyes, sighed loudly, gave him an incredulous look, and said, “Okay, fine.”. I noticed a couple of coworkers exchanging grins with each other, and I wondered if it must be strange to see a married couple working this way. (I wonder how they communicate with their spouses, who aren’t engineers.)
Recently, we had an incident where we were in a meeting. We got into a discussion where I was disagreeing with him. After we got done, there was a pause, and our supervisor said, “Actually, I’m more inclined to agree with Cherish.” This elicited loud “uh-ohs” and “woahs” from several of our coworkers, and even a direct, “Are you sure you want to get in the middle of this?”
I find this interesting as I’m sure these comments wouldn’t happen if we weren’t married. I’m amused by these types of comments, but I wonder if it’s that we’re doing something to elicit them or if it didn’t matter how we behaved as it would still be in the back of people’s minds anyway.
I also wonder if they think we disagree all the time because we do it frequently at work. More than one coworker has been driven out of the room by boisterous white board drawing. It’s funny how we are much more argumentative with each other at work than we are at home.
Pseudoscientific Scientists July 12, 2012
Posted by mareserinitatis in career, work.Tags: astrology, colleagues, coworkers, pseudoscience
1 comment so far
I talked a little while ago about trying to get my kids thinking critically about things that they read. I think it’s important to try to be realistic in expectations of how our kids develop those skills. It takes time to learn to question things and understand the role of evidence.
But what about when you have a colleague who is into pseudoscience? It recently came to my attention that someone who I know rather distantly and has a technical profession is rather heavily involved in some of this stuff. Now before you say anything, I am considering pseudoscience and religion/spirituality separate issues and won’t tolerate comments ragging on people’s religious beliefs. Pseudoscience, to me, is something which is easily tested and has been disproved…but people choose to believe it. One example would be astrology…which is what I’ll use as the problem ‘belief’ in this situation.
I began thinking I was relieved that I don’t work with this person because I wouldn’t be sure what to do. But what if I did?
I suppose this is where academics are lucky. Tenure is supposed to allow them to get involved in whatever they’re interested in without having to worry about how those interests, research or otherwise, impact their job. People outside academia or those who haven’t yet received tenure very often have to be more careful about those things. However, I thought tenure was meant to protect either lines of research that were not terribly popular or even political activities.
In my present position, I would be very nervous about someone like that working within my group. If word got out that one of my coworkers was actively promoting astrology, I would be terrified that somehow that person’s activities may somehow be associated with me and my research. I would hope that I would not be the victim of guilt by association. Unfortunately, I think that such activities may be identified with where I work and therefore carry over to me personally. After all, a scientist engaging in an activity that’s scientifically disproven can’t look good.
That brings me to an interesting question: do I have the right to ask them to keep their activities under wraps? If they’re actively promoting them and could be associated with me, I think that gives me a valid reason to ask them to do so out of courtesy. I am guessing it would be out of line for me to ask them to knock it off entirely, as much as I disagree with it. Or do I have to sit there and silently worry?
I am fortunate that this is a hypothetical situation, but I do have to wonder what the colleagues of this person I know might be thinking…
I also blog at Engineer Blogs, home away from home to some of the best engineering blogs.