My kingdom for a tutor (not Tudor)! February 24, 2017Posted by mareserinitatis in career, education, physics, science, teaching.
Tags: calculus, flipped classroom, physics, tutoring
add a comment
I’ve been very quiet. There’s good reason for that: prepping for new classes is a lot of work.
Specifically, I’m teaching university physics for the first time, and I have to admit that it’s very different from the other side of the (hypothetical and totally non-existent) podium. I’m also doing it as a flipped class, which is adding an extra layer of challenge as finding good videos is a particularly large time-suck. (No, it’s not faster than writing my own notes…but it does seem to be more effective.) Part of the reason it’s taking so much time is that I am spending a lot of time trying to figure out exactly where my students are at. I can definitely tell that this is a struggle for the ones who haven’t had much calc before, which is a feeling I certainly can understand as I was in the same boat when I started college. Unfortunately, we don’t have enough tutors who can handle physics to help everyone since our enrollment is way up. Not yet, anyway.
I am loathe to assume that someone who has insufficient math is not necessarily capable of passing physics. (After all, almost everyone I know says that you learn as much calc in physics as you do in an actual calculus class, a viewpoint which has a certain amount of merit.) As a result, I told students who didn’t do so well on the first test that I expected them to see me for weekly appointments. (Note: I did not *require* them to…just said I expected it. Not sure they understood the difference, but I figured it wasn’t worth explaining as most of them showed up.) I think they weren’t too excited about it at first, but the ones who are showing up are doing so very regularly. Apparently word got around, though, and even students who seem to be doing fairly well have started showing up, too. My office hours have basically turned into giant study sessions. (I think I need to start bringing donuts.) I had half the class show up over a two day period for the latest homework.
I personally think this is good. I am getting a sense for the kinds of things they have difficulty with and the overall frustration level has been decreasing, at least among the students coming in for help. In particular, getting some help with reasoning and processes is more effective when it’s coming from someone who has been doing this stuff for a long time. I’m tickled when they come in and automatically start doing the stuff I’ve been drilling them on (‘draw your free body diagram and then sum your forces!’) without any prompting. I also never realized how much homeschooling my kids would come in handy: when you’ve supervised all grade levels of math, you end up picking up lots of handy tricks to make life easier. I’m now able to pass those tidbits on to my students to help remedy some of the common computational issues I’ve run into.
I did tell them, however, that they better be prepared: next year, I will be teaching more classes, so they need to sign up to tutor the incoming freshman. A couple of them laughed. I don’t think they realized that I’m serious.
The semester is over!! December 16, 2016Posted by mareserinitatis in career, engineering, family, geology, teaching, work.
Tags: end-of-semester, physics, service, students, teaching
add a comment
My first semester at the new digs is in the bag. It was actually kinda awesome. (Sorry…I’ve never been able to ditch the word ‘awesome’…or ‘kinda,’ either.)
I’m not sure what I was expecting. I was as nervous as the freshmen going in, and I admit that the first couple months were kind of a shock. It’s not that there was a lot of bad stuff going on, but being at a small school was so different. The environment was so quiet compared to any place I’d worked or gone to school before, and it made me feel like something was wrong. There wasn’t, though: I just had to get used to the way things are done here and the different pacing. As the students loosened up, as well, we all began to have a lot more fun in class. I really enjoyed teaching because I had some very interested and attentive students, and I think most of them had a positive experience.
The service part of the job was surprisingly very enjoyable as it gave me the opportunity to get to know faculty from other departments. I learned more about accreditation and assessment, and I participated in my first search committee. I also helped a couple other departments with student-related activities, both for our students and as outreach to the local schools. It kept me busy, but it wasn’t too overwhelming. One thing I realized pretty quickly: we have a lot of female faculty here so I don’t imagine I’ll have to worry much (if ever) about being on too many committees because of a lack of representation from women.
One of the things I enjoyed most was having my own office again. I really hate working at home, and I loved being able to keep work and other stuff more separated. Sometimes I would drag home some grading while watching TV (which made it take three times as long), but for the most part, I did a lot of that at work. I definitely need ideas to decorate the place, though, as all I have now in a nerd clock and a grumpy cat poster hanging up.
The hardest part of working here is the back and forth to see family. I get a lot more done during the week so I don’t feel so bad taking some family time on the weekend, but it’s still hard not to see them every night. Thank goodness for google chat and unlimited cell phone minutes.
I’m excited about next semester: I will be teaching university physics. When I was a TA/tutor for physics in undergrad, a lot of my lab students would come to me for help in the class. I’ve been told a lot that I was very good at teaching it, and that’s stuck with me. I sure hope they’re right because I remember it being one of my favorite classes in undergrad. I also get to teach a general science class for non-majors, and I chose a geology-oriented topic for the focus. It’ll be interesting to see how it goes teaching non-majors again. My last experience was as a TA in grad school with students who really didn’t want to take science, so it wasn’t the most positive for me. However, I’m starting to learn that I can’t base anything off past experiences, so I’m aiming for that class to be fun, too.
And now, I think I want a nice cup of hot cocoa…
Paper woes and highs November 21, 2016Posted by mareserinitatis in career, education, engineering, papers, research, work.
Tags: citations, grading, homework, index, papers
add a comment
I really, really hate grading papers. I’m not sure why I assign them, except that I hope there will be a decent amount of reflection and introspection on the part of the students as they’re writing them. However, I would rather grade problem sets or even lab reports than papers.
Part of the problem is that I’m looking for content and it’s not always in the same place as you go from paper to paper. In problems and lab reports there’s generally a set structure. For papers…it’s not entirely clear.
The other part of the problem is that they just aren’t engaging for me, so I end up falling asleep reading them. I’m one of those people who has a hard time sitting down to read a book, even for fun, unless it’s intensely compelling. I will, however, be fine listening to books on tape (or CD or iPhone or whatever they are now). I thank this means I need to hire a really good voice actor who can read them to me. At the very least, it would be slightly more engaging. But then I would still have to assign a grade. :p
On the up side of papers, some of mine are finally getting cited. The good ones, I mean. I have watched over the past three years as one of my least favorite papers on which I’m a co-author steadily gained and gained citations. I couldn’t figure out why except that it’s in a “hot” area. Now two of my papers are starting to pick up citations (and my h-index is starting to creep up). One of the papers is a good theory paper which was accepted to a rather selective conference while the other was more experimental in an area I’d like to keep doing research in (at least the theory aspect of it…don’t have the equipment to do experimental work now). I’m just going to keep my fingers crossed and hope that they pass up the crappy paper in a couple years. If either one does, it’ll be a reason to make something especially delicious and celebrate.
Answering the sexism in STEM question September 27, 2016Posted by mareserinitatis in career, engineering, feminism, science, societal commentary.
Tags: feminism, sexism, women in engineering, women in science
add a comment
I’m not a big fan of career panels for women in science, at least for those in college and above. However, panels of women in STEM careers for high school students and younger, I think, are important, primarily because they show young women that there are other women who are scientists and mathematicians and engineers, even if they do nothing else. Being able to identify with a panelist because of sex/gender is going to go a long way to breaking down stereotypes.
I was involved in one such panel over the past weekend. I was one of three women who has a career using math outside of being a mathematician, and we were talking to high school students about our careers in math-intensive fields.
I feel awkward when the question comes up (and it always does) about whether one encounters sexism as a woman in a STEM field. I don’t want to say anything discouraging, nor do I want to lie. I also get nervous, worrying that I may be the only one who has had to deal with it. I was fortunate this weekend in that all three of us seemed to have a range of experience dealing with this, but we were all able to say that it was not the majority of the time. Yes, we told them, you’re going to run into it, but it’s primarily a handful of individuals who are that way. Most of the time, you’ll be treated as respectfully, as a colleague. And unlike in the past, if you find you’re dealing with more of it than you want to, there are a lot more opportunities to find a career in greener, less sexist pastures. We all agreed the situation had improved significantly in the past twenty years.
That being said, I would really like to stand in front of a group like that and say, no, it doesn’t matter and you won’t see it. I suspect I will be waiting a long time, but I keep hoping.
The first week September 5, 2016Posted by mareserinitatis in career, education, engineering, work.
Tags: busy, pace, SLAC
I finished my first week teaching in my new institution, and I have to say it was very strange.
I started college at a small university, but it had twice as many graduate students as undergrads, and it was in the middle of a large metropolitan area. While the campus wasn’t huge, it was relatively busy. I finished my undergrad at a mid-size state school, but the department I was in was tiny. I had very small upper-level classes but most of my generals were in very large classes, one even having about 500 students. For my MS, I switched to one of the largest departments, which was a jolt. While my classes weren’t huge (15-20 per class in the grad program), there were a lot of people around and pace and flavor of the department was far less intimate. There were people in the building nearly 24 hours. For the PhD, I was in a very large state university in a big city but in a small department. Even so, my classes typically had at least 20 people in them. At all of these places, it seemed like, at least during the school year, the pace was hectic and there were a lot of people always around. I always felt like I was busy.
Now I’m in a new department (I’m one of two faculty) in a small liberal arts college in a small town. The feel is completely different. The classes are smaller, and the students always seem to be off at class. The campus quad is usually quiet, unlike the last place (the really big university in the middle of city). At the big school, people would eat lunch while listening to the Christian hippy-looking fellow standing on a ladder in front of the library, preaching fire and brimstone or playing inspirational music and singing slightly out of tune. Other students would be playing frisbee or football. Now I mostly see people walking from one building to the other (usually on the sidewalks!), with the occasional line coming out of the student center because everyone decided to grab lunch at the same time.
While I’m kind of surprised by the quietness, I am also enjoying the lack of everything feeling so hectic. My colleagues generally seem to be laid back, the students are mostly pleasant and polite. Everyone is getting things done, but no one seems to be running around all frantic and the campus doesn’t feel like a beehive.
Of course, it’s early in the semester; I’ll have to revisit this train of thought in December.
Brand new professor August 27, 2016Posted by mareserinitatis in career, engineering, teaching, Uncategorized.
Tags: advising, new job, students, teaching
1 comment so far
I finished my first week as a new professor. It was exhausting. I spent most of the week drinking from the firehose of information about my new institution. A colleague says every institution does the same thing to new faculty and he doesn’t understand why, but I think I do: it certainly creates empathy for the students. Going to college is at every bit as stressful as being a new faculty.
The hardest part for me is just being around unfamiliar people all day. While my colleagues are almost entirely warm and welcoming, my introversion was severely stressed and I really needed down time in evening with no people. As much as I don’t like the commuting arrangement, I greatly appreciated the much-needed down time it afforded me. I also was short on time for running (also good stress relief), so I tried to tell myself that the multiple flights of stairs I was taking daily to reach my office were an adequate substitute.
I finally met some students yesterday. Many of our students are athletes, and I saw an unexpected and very interesting side benefit to this: 2/3 of my advisees were minorities. I am very excited by the possibility that there may be enough students that they won’t feel out of place. Unfortunately, there are no women, though I think we should start a SWE chapter anyway.
My final experience this week as a professor was with one of my advisees. We shook hands and, after he sat down, saw the hand sanitizer on my desk and asked to use some. I said feel free, but then became worried that I should be using some, too.
Returning to the land of the employed June 28, 2016Posted by mareserinitatis in career, engineering, teaching.
Tags: academia, career, job
I’m so excited! I finally have something to post about! And it’s not just cat and dog pictures! Or discussions about comic book characters!
I will be starting a new job in the fall as an engineering professor at a small liberal arts college.
I’ll be honest: no one is more surprised about this than me. Until recently, I hadn’t ever thought about liberal arts colleges as a possible career choice. Over the past couple of years, however, I’ve gotten the sense that I don’t fit well into a lot of research universities. Despite a lot of places saying they wan’t people who do interdisciplinary research, it’s become pretty plain that they still want you to have all your degrees in one field. Grant reviewers don’t like grants that are too far outside their expertise, either, which makes it hard to get funding.
All of that pushed me to start thinking about liberal arts colleges, particularly since I have a strong interest in education and pedagogy. That ended up being a good decision.
The program is brand new, so I’ll be setting up some classes and labs from scratch. While that’s daunting, it’s also exciting, especially because of the educational aspect. Designing classes around a student-centered, hands-on approach is going to be easier (I hope) than trying to remake everything. I hope my students will be okay being guinea pigs. I’m certainly okay with getting to play with lab equipment. The classes will initially be pretty small, but I don’t think they’ll ever get huge. (I’ve been informed the largest classes at the school are around 50-60 students, and those aren’t common.)
The down side is that the school isn’t in town, so I’m in the process of finding a buying a new place to live. It IS close enough that I’ll be able to come home frequently, but a little too far for a daily commute. I am therefore also in the process of trying to teach the younger offspring how to cook…well, something other than mac and cheese or toast.
Anyway, the pace of life has definitely picked up, but that’s a good thing.
Post-doc season June 17, 2016Posted by mareserinitatis in career, research.
Tags: engineering research, post-doc
add a comment
It appears to be that time of year again. My mailbox has been filling with CVs from people who want me to give them a post-doc. Some of them are actually in electromagnetics, so it makes sense why they would contact me. (Some…but not most.)
This year, however, I was contemplating handling it a bit differently than previous years. Given I’m not currently employed, I can’t really offer them a post-doc. (I also couldn’t when I was employed, either, but humor me.) This year, therefore, I have contemplated writing them back to say I’m in the same boat they are and that they should let me know if they come across anything open.
I don’t imagine I’d hear back from them.
I also can’t imagine myself sending that particular email, either. But it is funny to contemplate their possible reaction.
Diversity statement woes April 27, 2016Posted by mareserinitatis in career, education, feminism, science, teaching, work.
Tags: application process, diversity, diversity statement, feminism
add a comment
One of the newer things I’ve seen in academic job postings is a request for a diversity statement. If you haven’t seen them, it’s a statement addressing how you would address issues of race, gender, sexual orientation, disability, etc. I came across a request for one recently, and I have to admit that they make me cringe for a couple reasons. On the surface, they make a lot of sense: obviously if you have a diverse student body, you want to make sure that you’re hiring someone who is aware of that and has communicated all they ways they are prepared to deal with it.
So why do they make me cringe?
First, I see a potential for abuse. Academics tend to, on the whole, be a rather liberal lot, and one could easily see this as a screening mechanism to ensure that someone with a wildly different perspective doesn’t make it through the door. While I personally find it frustrating that people have issues with marginalized groups (and FSM knows how much of this I’ve dealt with first hand), I still think this means that people with differing viewpoints will be weeded out. I don’t see an easy answer to this, though. As I said above, you don’t want to hire someone who refuses to work with these groups or who creates an asymmetric educational experience for them lest, as an institution, you end up on the receiving end of a discrimination lawsuit. I’m just going to throw that out as a concern and leave it there.
My other concern, though, is more grounded in my background. These requests are severely biased towards those in the humanities and soft sciences where many of them can use part of their course topics and research as evidence. If you’re in the hard sciences, that’s obviously not an option. If you have access to resources to address this at all, it may be dependent on institutional support which may or may not be present. In the sciences, training for education/teaching at all is severely limited to begin with and what we do get has to be sought out through other departments in the university, if it’s even available. Depending on the size of the institution, there may not be a women’s center or diversity office to provide information and training.
As I’ve been contemplating writing such a statement, it leaves me in an odd spot. I could personally use some of my blogging about women in the sciences. However, depending on who is reviewing the statement, I may also get dinged because this may be viewed critically rather than as an asset. The same goes for membership in female-oriented professional societies such as IEEE Women in Engineering, Society of Women Engineers, or Association of Women Geoscientists. Realistically, some people who review these statements will have a negative view of such participation and advocacy even while the statements are a required part of the application package. Let’s be honest: not everyone sees the need to increase or address diversity in their departments, and being too much of an advocate could have negative repercussions during the selection process.
My personal feeling is that, in STEM, a lot of these issues are going to be limited to classroom accessibility and student mentoring. I would prefer that universities could ask STEM faculty how inclusivity of these groups would be addressed as part of the teaching statement and omit requests for a diversity statement.
Scientific Status Quo July 12, 2015Posted by mareserinitatis in career, family, feminism, research, societal commentary, work.
Tags: career, family/work balance, marriage, parenting, research, work-life balance
A couple days ago, @katiesci posted this opinion piece from Science by Eleftherios Diamandis on getting noticed. I was rather frustrated with the article because the way to get noticed was apparently to put in a lot of face time (which is probably decent advice) and to publish like crazy (also not bad advice), even if it means you have to work unrealistic schedules and foist all of your childcare duties onto your spouse.
It was this last part that got under my skin because it’s so much a recapitulation of the status quo: you can’t do anything else and be a scientist, forget balance if you want an academic career.
I have to admit I jumped to a pretty lousy conclusion when I read the following:
I worked 16 to 17 hours a day, not just to make progress on the technology but also to publish our results in high-impact journals. How did I manage it? My wife—also a Ph.D. scientist—worked far less than I did; she took on the bulk of the domestic responsibilities. Our children spent many Saturdays and some Sundays playing in the company lobby. We made lunch in the break room microwave.
I can’t presume to know the dynamic between the author and his wife, and it may be that she was perfectly happy with this arrangement. Academic couples tend to understand better than others how frustrating this career path can be, and I know there were several occasions where either my husband or myself was bringing the other dinner/microwaving in the lobby or lunch room to help ease the stress of deadlines along with an empty stomach.
But what about the people for whom this is not an option? Most of the people I know get very upset if their spouse is putting in more than 60 hours per week. Are they just supposed to give up? What about people who are physically unable to work those types of hours? Even if you are physically capable, it’s bad for you in the long run and turns out to be rather useless.
If anything, this just reinforced that to make it in science, you don’t have to do good science, you just have to be willing to give up any semblance of a family life and turn into a squeaky wheel. I’m not sure what the author intended to convey, but reading this piece was rather disheartening.
Instead, I’d rather have heard about how the author’s wife did it: how is it she was able to work less hours than him, raise their kids, and still manage to have an apparently successful career? At least, that’s the implication at the end of the piece. To me, it sounds like she was able to handle a very unbalanced load successfully, and unless it’s, “don’t sleep,” I would think she may have some advice worth sharing with the rest of us mere mortals. If you happen to be from Science magazine, could you please let her know?