jump to navigation

Another approach to multiplication November 14, 2011

Posted by mareserinitatis in math, teaching, Uncategorized, younger son.
Tags: , , ,
1 comment so far

My younger boy has been working through multiplication, and the problems he’s doing are getting more difficult, so I decided it was time to start working with the dreaded memorization.

I’ve talked before about simply giving kids multiplication tables to work from.  My younger son, however, seems like he’s a little better with memorization, so we took the following approach.

Most kids have a fairly easy time with learning to count by twos, threes, and fives.  So that’s where you start.  The other thing the child needs to know is how to add with carrying.  If the child can do that, the rest of the tables are easy.  Since counting by 2s and 3s is known, we’ll start with fours.

If you have a problem involving a 4, say 8 x 4, then you have them compute 8 x 2.  Once they have the answer to that, have them double it.  So basically, once they know all their 2s, they can easily obtain their fours.  The same principle goes for 6s and 8s.  For a multiplication problem involving a 6, they can either add the corresponding problem with twos three times or take the threes problem twice.  Finally, for 8s, they can work from twos to fours, and then from fours to eights.

With the younger boy, this means that if he has a problem like 8×7, he first figures out 2×7.  He doubles that answer to get 4×7, and then doubles it again to get 8×7.  For him, adding things up goes a bit faster.

For nines, he uses the finger method: he holds down the finger that corresponds to the multiplier, moving from left to right.  That is, if he has 3×9, he holds down the third finger from the left.  To the left of that finger, he has the number of tens (in this case, 2), and to the right he has the number of ones (7).  So the answer is 27.

So what do you do about 7s?  Actually, given you have methods for everything else, the only one to memorize is 7×7.  On the other hand, if you have a kid that sort of stuck when it comes to commutivity of multiplication, then another way to deal with it is that it’s the sum of the threes problem and the fours problem.  (7×7 = 3×7 + 4×7 = 21 + 28 = 49)

Tens are usually pretty easy, so I’ll skip that one.

Eleven and twelve were learned by breaking them into two parts.  First, take the number times ten and then take it times one (for eleven) or two (for twelve) and add the results.  So 12×9 would be 10×9 plus 2×9.

I’m fairly certain this method would have never worked with my older boy.  He has very poor working memory and ADHD, so I don’t think he was able to do a lot of this in his head (and was always resistant to writing it down).  For him, I think using a multiplication table was a better approach.  For the younger boy, though, who seems to enjoy working through problems and has a very good working memory, this has been a far more, and I might even say quicker, method.

Teaching math without memorization March 2, 2011

Posted by mareserinitatis in education, gifted, homeschooling, math, older son, teaching.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
12 comments

If there is one thing I learned in my junior level electromagnetics class that will always stick with me, it’s this:

The permittivity of free space (ε0) is 8.854 * 10 -12 F/m.

And realizing that will always stick with me gave me a lot of insight into what is wrong with the typical approach to teaching math, especially in elementary school.

I know it’s a stretch, but bear with me.


(Totally gratuitous picture of a cute baby bear.)

One of the things I’ve encountered with both my kids is that their teachers are very set on them memorizing math facts. My older boy spent 3rd and 6th grade enrolled full-time in regular public school programs, and his third grade teacher was constantly railing on about how he was ‘bad in math’. In fact, she blamed it on the fact that he’d been homeschooling. (We got this every time we talked to her.) She would go on and on about how he didn’t have his tables memorized. Why, he had to stop and think every time she asked him a basic addition problem!

OMG…thinking in school?! Can’t have that.

I therefore found it very amusing when, prior to the the next school year, his principle pulled out the results of his spring MAPS testing and commented on how good his math scores were because, in her words, “He must know his tables really well.”

By these two comments alone, you can tell what is important to elementary school teachers: memorization of arithmetic tables.

Aside from having a BS in physics, I minored in math in college. Despite the fact that I had enough credits for a major, the credits were in overwhelmingly applied math classes, and there was no applied math major at my school. Suffice it to say that I do have at least a basic knowledge of math.

I also have homeschooled my older child for most of his educational career, and as a freshman in high school, he’s finishing a course in college algebra and trigonometry.

During the older child’s homeschooling years, I never once made an attempt to have him memorize tables of any kind. I did not practice a lot of repetition of basic facts, either. This was because of my experience in my electromagnetics class: I didn’t memorize the value of the permittivity of free space due to repetition and drill; I memorized it because I used it in nearly every problem I did for four months in that class. Yeah, I had to look it up the first dozen times I used it, but after that, it was lodged in my brain. And look…it’s still there a decade later!

I came to the conclusion that if you really need to know something, you’ll learn it through frequent use. But how do you use something that you don’t know?

Addition and subtraction are fairly simple: you give a kid a bead frame, abacus, or even a ruler (the original slide rule!) and show them how to perform addition and subtraction operations using beads or moving up and down a number line. Then you can move them quite quickly through addition and subtraction of infinitely (okay…not infinite) finitely large numbers.  You can let them go through increasingly complex topics without ever making them memorize a table.  In fact, after a short time, you’ll find that they are pointing at beads or rulers in the air, counting out the solution to their problem.  And after that, the invisible ruler or beads will be sitting in their head, being manipulated by mental fingers.  Finally, they won’t even have to think about it…they’ll just know.

The image on the left is an abacus, while the image on the right is a bead frame. Bead frames are easier to find and manipulate, in my experience.

Multiplication should be taught as addition of groups of objects, and division as ‘counting’ of the number of groups in the whole. Once kids have mastered the process of multiplication and division, you can then simply print out a multiplication table. I had my older son paste it on the inside cover of a notebook or the front of a folder so that he could always find it. You may find that some kids prefer to go back to the bead frames.  (And if you are really lucky, you have an abacus and know how to use it for multiplication…which I don’t.)  Any method is fine as long as it works for your child. But the point is that you can then let them progress through more and more complicated arithmetic involving those operations (such as multiplying large numbers or long division) using the table or other device to look up values. Again, as you progress through these concepts, they will slowly begin to memorize them.

As a homeschooler, the curriculum that I chose for math was fairly important as well. I liked Singapore math for it’s focus on simplicity and conceptual explanations. Everyone raves about the ‘mental math’ tricks that are taught in the series. And they’re right: mental math is awesome. However, the only reason the series does it so effectively is because it teaches the concepts in a way that you can then make logical simplifications in process that result in ‘mental math’ and good estimation skills.

(My only complaint is that they don’t teach the lattice method of multiplication. I think the ‘traditional’ method of multiplying large numbers is much better suited for estimation methods, whereas the lattice method is definitely superior for calculating with precision.)

To me, the important part of all of this is to make sure that they understand what the process of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. Kids can memorize facts for quick recall, but if that is the emphasis and they can’t recall a fact, they’re going to be stuck.  If the emphasis is instead on teaching arithmetic as a process, they can always figure it out should they forget.

And really, arithmetic is a process.  I came across an article on Hoagies’ Gifted site called Why Memorize? I have to take big exception to the article because it says that math is a lot of dry facts.  If you teach it as memorization of facts instead of a process of manipulating numbers (or objects or motion in space), it sure is!  But I can tell you that it’s not, and as you advance to higher level classes in mathematics, reliance on the notion that math is memorization will cause you problems and impede your progression.

Finally, I have to wonder if this is why so many elementary school educators fear math: it’s boring memorization of facts.  They are never taught how it’s actually a really cool process.  If it were taught properly, preferably with a lot of enthusiasm instead of dread, I wonder if a lot of teachers would lose their ‘math-phobia’.   And that would, of course, mean their students might start to like math, too.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,286 other followers